Re: Manually transpile Python code to GP: what about class / __name__ ?

[hermann@stamm-wilbrandt.de]

On 2023-09-10 15:03, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The whole problem is that this does not allow to change RSA.
>
> ? RSA.set=x->RSA[1]=x
> %1 = (RSA)->x->RSA[1]=x
> ? RSA=[0,0];
> ? RSA.set(2)
> %3 = 2
> ? RSA
> %4 = [0,0]
Thanks, usecase does not need to change RSA, so member functions are 
good enough.


> > 1)
> > Is it possible to define a member function without parameter?
>
> you can do this
> RSA.factored_2=()->{
> ...
> }
>
> > 2)
...
> > Is is possible to define default value for GP member function 
> > parameter
> > directly?
...
> RSA.factored = (mod4=-1)->{
> }
...
> > 3)
> > I did not need sofar, but is it possible to pass multiple parameter"s 
> > to GP
> > member function?
> > (this likely does not make sense for what GP member functions have 
> > been
> > implemented)
>
> You can do
> RSA.fun=(x,y)->{...
> }
> If this is what you have in mind.
Thanks for all proposals, I changed repo accordingly with this commit:
https://github.com/Hermann-SW/RSA_numbers_factored/commit/402708433a0b2e16d82958535731d1fcd9546c4f


Regarding passing two parameters, I did that in 1st of new member 
function shortcuts:

RSA.to_squares_sum=(sqrtm1, p)->{
\\  """ shortcut """
    to_squares_sum(sqrtm1, p);
}

RSA.to_sqrtm1=to_sqrtm1;
\\  """ shortcut """


Regards,

Hermann.