Aurel Page on Thu, 05 Jun 2025 10:51:40 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: question on a possible new function or extending the existing one for core() |
Dear Randall,Since factor accepts t_FRAC inputs, we could consider extending core, but it is not clear to me that the definition you propose is meaningful. qcore2(n) = core(numerator(n))*core(denominator(n)) would give unique representatives in Q*/(Q*)^2, unlike your definition. What is your motivation for this extension?
Cheers, Aurel On 21/05/2025 10:36, American Citizen wrote:
We know that core finds the non-square portion of an integer number and returns it, or if a nonzero flag is used, returns both the non-square and the positive square root of the square (which is handy)Can we extend core to the t_FRAC type? I defined qcore(n) = core(numerator(n))/core(denominator(n)), and I suppose f can be found from this too.Please consider extending this function? Thank you. Randall