Laël Cellier on Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:40:56 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Reimplementing the cubic sieve faster |
Yes, but how to compute the hard part in the case of the cubic sieve. How to select a+b+c=0 without negative number without modular arithmetic ? Le 03/06/2025 à 00:20, Bill Allombert a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 11:58:31PM +0200, Laël Cellier wrote:Problem, is in my case it doesnt integrate with Pari-ɢᴘ.You can always use extern(), thats does not seem to be a practical problem.How do I solve the linear system ?This is the hard part. cado-nfs sparse linear algebra is much faster than PARI. In fact PARI quadratic sieve would probably be fast enough if cado-nfs sparse linear algebra was used.Stupid question, but when you write about picking a triplet such a+b+c=0, do you mean picking them mod p ?No, a,b,c are much smaller than p, so |a+b+c| < p. Cheers, Bill.